The install order for SS 3. Vendor URL: www. Cause: Access control error , Exception handling error , Input validation error. Message History: None. Source Message Contents. The recommended best practices herein are generally covered in the MS IIS lockdown guide I would supply the URL but I have found the Microsoft Security site too difficult to navigate as of late, and was unable to find the new resting place of this document.
I figured it's definately past time to release some new documents. I've always meant to take a peek into Site Server, to see if anything evil was inside.
To install that, you need to first install the regular Site Server 3. So I never was able to get my hands on a copy of the regular 3. That was around a year ago, maybe more. Fast forward to last week, Shimmer, a fellow security buff, passed along a copy of Site Server 3. It didn't take long to start coming across 'uncool' stuff. Basically what I did was install the regular Site Server 3. I then upgraded to Commerce edition and looked for additional bugs.
So 3 installations, each having it's own section. Just to state up front, we have no idea if these bugs exist on the Win2K platform, or in Site Server Perhaps a subject for a later date. And yes, Site Server 3. In the example URLs, 'solce. Some vulnerabilities are already known for this version of Site Server. In particular, MS KB details 6 separate viewcode. This is documented as BugtraqID There are other bugs, but they apply to Site Server 3. Onto the bugs Shimmer actually ran across this during his own hack-fest.
He also noted that the system appears to meticuously clean up after this particular user account The risks at this point are moderate: someone can use this account to log into the machine and otherwise access system resources but with few actual privileges. However we will build upon this. It just hasn't surfaced in the security community. Systems that have or had in the past Site Server 3. Solution: upgrade to Site Server SP4.
So onto the info leaks View the source Can add arbitrary users, and put them in arbitrary groups including Admin Group. Not much value in that tho. The impact varies according to what information is leaked, but none of it would likely lead to a system compromise directly.
Feedback will be sent to Microsoft: By pressing the submit button, your feedback will be used to improve Microsoft products and services. Privacy policy. Daniel Bleichenbacher, a researcher at Bell Labs, the research arm of Lucent Technologies, made this discovery.
The purpose of this bulletin is to inform Microsoft customers of this issue, its applicability to Microsoft products, and the availability of countermeasures that Microsoft has developed to further secure its customers. No customers have currently reported being impacted by this issue. The vulnerability can only affect customers who use the SSL protocol in Microsoft's internet server products.
Please see RSA's announcement on this issue for additional information. Using complex mathematical analysis and some trial and error, Bleichenbacher discovered that an Internet transaction encrypted with SSL could be decoded.
This is an issue that requires an updating of Internet server software, not client software such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. To use this discovered vulnerability as an attack, the attacker must first be able to observe the encrypted transaction between a Web client and a Web server.
Once a recording of this encrypted transaction is made, the attacker would then need to send a large number of carefully constructed messages to the original Web server and analyze the responses. For its time Site Server offered one very credible among a select few alternatives for such functionality - particularly on the Windows platform. At its release it generally came out to very positive reviews in technical journals, although compared to later products its management tools were on the arcane side.
The content management functionality was adequate, but not particularly competitive with dedicated document management systems that were available at the time. On this front, Site Server's main advantage was its low cost. Another feature that might have been a source of confusion was the taxonomy management system.
The tools used to maintain item metadata were very basic and required a degree of technical familiarity foreign to most business users. On the plus side, once configured, Site Server got very high ratings for management of conducting e-commerce.
Management of products and orders was fairly sophisticated - a strength that would be extended in the technology that succeeded it: Microsoft Commerce Server. Site Server required the presence of either the Windows NT 4. Microsoft has discontinued production and support of Site Server. E-commerce functionality was moved into a new product called Microsoft Commerce Server. After the e-commerce technology was integrated, Site Server was sold in two editions: Standard, and Commerce.
The Commerce Editions incorporated a hefty premium in their cost. All translations of microsoft site server.
A windows pop-into of information full-content of Sensagent triggered by double-clicking any word on your webpage. Give contextual explanation and translation from your sites! Try here or get the code.
0コメント